<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
    <title>Ted&apos;s Blog</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://mac.fiveforks.com/ted/blog/
    <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://mac.fiveforks.com/ted/blog/atom.xml" />
   <id>tag:mac.fiveforks.com,2008:/ted/blog//6</id>
    <link rel="service.post" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://mac.fiveforks.com/cgi-bin/mt41/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=6" title="Ted's Blog
    <updated>2008-07-18T18:30:26Z</updated>
    <subtitle>Do not meddle in the affairs of Wizards, for they are subtle and quick to anger.</subtitle>
    <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type 4.1</generator>
 

<entry>
    <title>Buy Low Buy High</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://mac.fiveforks.com/ted/blog/archive/2008/buy_low_buy_high.html
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://mac.fiveforks.com/cgi-bin/mt41/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=6/entry_id=2218" title="Buy Low Buy High
    <id>tag:mac.fiveforks.com,2008:/ted/blog//6.2218</id>
    
    <published>2008-07-17T23:24:53Z</published>
    <updated>2008-07-18T18:30:26Z</updated>
    
    <summary>Some of the best money I ever lost was when I sold Suntrust last year. I had bought it after Dad said it was probably ripe for a takeover that might increase its price. It had gone down lately, so...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Ted</name>
        
    </author>
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://mac.fiveforks.com/ted/blog/">
        <![CDATA[<p>Some of the best money I ever lost was when I sold Suntrust last year. I had bought it after Dad said it was probably ripe for a takeover that might increase its price. It had gone down lately, so I bought as many shares as I could with the money I had sitting around in my brokerage account: 19 shares at $77.06. That was in May 2006. It went up slowly but steadily and by the following year was at $90. My goal was to make 20%, so I wouldn't sell until it got to $93.28. Then it started going down. By October I was losing money. In November I decided to sell at a loss, $71.20. I say it was the best money I ever lost because it really started going down after that and every dollar it went down was a dollar I didn't lose.</p>]]>
        <![CDATA[<p>Despite a steady fall, I decided the mortgage mess was played out and it was time to buy back in again at $47 on June 6. The fall accelerated. Less than 2 weeks later it was down 20%, which instead of selling can be a sign for me to buy more. This has worked well for me with Oracle and Microsoft stock. Then I sell when things go back up and I usually can show a loss on paper by saying I sold the original higher priced shares. Eventually I will have a bigger gain, but it would hopefully be long term at that point. So I bought some more at $36.98. About a month later it fell drastically again and I was down another 20%. Time to buy more, but at this point I'm getting nervous. I bought some more at $29.00 just this week.</p>

<p>It went down a little more, to $25.60, but not enough to buy more (I decided I didn't want any more anyway). Yesterday it sprang back to life very quickly, up 15%. This morning it opened with another big gain. My newest shares had a target sell price of $35.50, so I entered an order to sell at that price. At the time the shares were selling in the high 34's, so it wasn't a lock that the limit would be met and the order would be executed. I checked back about an hour later anyway. I noticed I had too many shares and that my order had gone through at only $34.66. In fact, what I had done earlier was to enter a <B>buy</B> order at $35.50 which had executed immediately and instead of dumping some of this stuff at a better price than 2 days ago, I had just bought my 4th batch. Don't worry, it gets worse.</p>

<p>By this time, calmer heads had prevailed and the stock was on its way down. I quickly calculated the price I would need to sell the shares just to break even (and pay for the $7 commission twice): $35.30. So I put in a sell order at that price, but by this time the shares were down to $33. It gets worse. Around 11 AM, Suntrust was actually below yesterday's closing price of $31.83. Now that mess up was costing me $76. I hung tough, hoping for the best.</p>

<p><span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image" style="display: inline;"><img alt="sti.png" src="http://mac.fiveforks.com/ted/blog/archive/2008/sti.png" width="192" height="96" class="mt-image-center" style="text-align: center; display: block; margin: 0 auto 20px;" /></span></p>

<p>It got better. For some reason it was off to the races again and the stock climbed up to 34 again before closing at $34.58. I would have sold at that price and taken the small loss but the network crashed at about 3:30 and I wasn't up and running again until about 4:30, after the market closed. So I never sold the shares, but I hope that I can tomorrow. There were some earnings reports that didn't meet analyst expectations, so tomorrow could be rough, plus with the stock up over 20% in two days, the chances of it going down tomorrow are pretty high.</p>

<p>The lesson here is to be careful. I put some blame on the broker, Scottrade, and their website since it seems like they could warn you that you are entering a limit order that will execute immediately, but they can't make the system idiot-proof either. And I was an idiot today. Also I have to question myself for buying Suntrust again. I think part of it was a desire to buy the stock back for less than I had sold it for and really I should have been happy sitting it out.</p>]]>
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Q2 Report</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://mac.fiveforks.com/ted/blog/archive/2008/q2_report.html
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://mac.fiveforks.com/cgi-bin/mt41/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=6/entry_id=2214" title="Q2 Report
    <id>tag:mac.fiveforks.com,2008:/ted/blog//6.2214</id>
    
    <published>2008-07-01T23:29:54Z</published>
    <updated>2008-07-02T00:01:12Z</updated>
    
    <summary>After horrible results in the first quarter of 2008, things got a lot better. A big part of this had to be going back and putting up my web pages on Speedfactory again. This caused some growth in traffic (still...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Ted</name>
        
    </author>
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://mac.fiveforks.com/ted/blog/">
        <![CDATA[<p>After horrible results in the <A HREF="http://mac.fiveforks.com/ted/blog/archive/2008/back_to_speedfactory.html">first quarter of 2008</A>, things got a lot better. A big part of this had to be going back and putting up my web pages on <A HREF="http://mac.fiveforks.com/ted/blog/archive/2008/back_to_speedfactory.html">Speedfactory again</A>. This caused some growth in traffic (still off from last year but holding steady at about 200 visitors a day), got most of my page rank back from Google, brought back my advertising deal, and seemed to cause a general increase in Amazon sales. For the quarter I had $2,700 in sales for commissions of $121.73. This is way off, but I didn't re-post at Speedfactory until the end of May. The most popular thing is still the Maxell battery pack, with 19 sold. I also sold 7 Griffin TuneJuice 2's, 7 PAC Sony-iPod adapters, and 5 Turbo Charge chargers. The most expensive thing sold were some Bose noise-canceling headphones. Other than a very weird book about exercise, the most unusual thing sold was a Magnum pepper mill for $31. </p>

<p>AdSense remained pretty anemic at less than $15 per month. Even though I deleted all of their ads off of the iPod battery pages in lieu of the new ads, revenue in June was still up a little bit from Dejumbler and iPod-Sony ads alone, perhaps because the higher page rank boosted the price of those ads.</p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>New Office</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://mac.fiveforks.com/ted/blog/archive/2008/new_office.html
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://mac.fiveforks.com/cgi-bin/mt41/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=6/entry_id=2213" title="New Office
    <id>tag:mac.fiveforks.com,2008:/ted/blog//6.2213</id>
    
    <published>2008-07-01T23:06:38Z</published>
    <updated>2008-07-02T03:33:29Z</updated>
    
    <summary>Our office was located near the Capitol since the 1930&apos;s. For unknown motivations, a decision was made to rent some space in Atlanta. After looking at several spots, an office building in Midtown was picked and I am on the...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Ted</name>
        
    </author>
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://mac.fiveforks.com/ted/blog/">
        <![CDATA[<p>Our office was located near the Capitol since the 1930's. For unknown motivations, a decision was made to rent some space in Atlanta. After looking at several spots, an office building in Midtown was picked and I am on the 24th floor. My office (actually a cubicle) has a south facing window that lets me see all of downtown. I used the camera to take multi-part panorama and then some Canon software to stitch the 3 separate photos together on my computer. The picture below represents my view looking South down West Peachtree Street. In real life there is more detail. For instance, to the right of the Westin Peachtree Plaza there is a building with a V shape on it. Just to the left of that building there is a tiny spec in the picture on the horizon. That spec is the Hartsfield-Jackson Airport control tower.</p>

<p><span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image" style="display: inline;"><a href="http://mac.fiveforks.com/ted/blog/archive/2008/office-south.html" onclick="window.open('http://mac.fiveforks.com/ted/blog/archive/2008/office-south.html','popup','width=1800,height=640,scrollbars=yes,resizable=no,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=no,left=0,top=0'); return false"><img src="http://mac.fiveforks.com/ted/blog/archive/2008/office-south-thumb-400x142.jpg" width="400" height="142" alt="office-south.jpg" class="mt-image-center" style="text-align: center; display: block; margin: 0 auto 20px;" /></a></span></p>]]>
        <![CDATA[<p>The new building is a big improvement for us. The temperature is comfortable, the bathrooms are very nice, the view is great (our office takes up most of the floor so I can visit other groups and see North, East, and West; I have panoramas of those too). But now that I have to transfer to the North-South MARTA line, it takes about 15 minutes longer to get to work. That's 30 minutes a day, 2.5 hours per week, 5 days per year, 60 solid days lost before I retire.</p>

<p>We spent about a week packing stuff up and throwing away everything we could. I personally probably threw away about 8 garbage cans of paper. We packed everything into crates stacked 4 high and I probably had 16 crates of stuff. The new desks are bigger, but the storage space is definitely less. It's been a challenge getting moved in. I volunteered to go over this past weekend to help facilitate the move and was there from about 10:30 to 5 Saturday.</p>]]>
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>From Nicole to Ted</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://mac.fiveforks.com/ted/blog/archive/2008/from_nicole_to_ted.html
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://mac.fiveforks.com/cgi-bin/mt41/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=6/entry_id=2212" title="From Nicole to Ted
    <id>tag:mac.fiveforks.com,2008:/ted/blog//6.2212</id>
    
    <published>2008-06-30T04:28:53Z</published>
    <updated>2008-06-30T03:48:30Z</updated>
    
    <summary>I got my first letter from Nicole yesterday. Unfortunately it was just after I had mailed my fifth letter to her (every Saturday so far!), so our communications are substantially crossed. In the letter she included my name in Armenian...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Ted</name>
        
    </author>
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://mac.fiveforks.com/ted/blog/">
        <![CDATA[<p>I got my first letter from Nicole yesterday. Unfortunately it was just after I had mailed my fifth letter to her (every Saturday so far!), so our communications are substantially crossed. In the letter she included my name in Armenian letters and signed it with her name in Armenian letters. Since I type my letters on the computer and I know that there are fonts built in to Windows with Armenian (unicode fonts like Arial), I started trying to figure out how to incorporate some Armenian letters in my letters. </p>

<p>Nicole</p>

<p><font size=6>&#1350;&#1387;&#1391;&#1400;&#1388</font></p>

<p>To create these letters on the web you have to know the 4-digit unicode number of each letter. Nicole's letters are: 1350, 1387, 1391, 1400, 1388. Each number has to start with an ampersand and pound and then end with a semicolon. It helps if you increase the size of the font.</p>

<p>Ted (1359-1383-1380)</p>

<p><font size=6>&#1359;&#1383;&#1380;</font></p>

<p>To do the same thing in Word 2007, you have to use the hexadecimal version of the number. You just type it in, then you highlight the 4 letters and press ALT+X. The hex codes for Nicole are 0546-056B-056F-0578-056C. For Ted it is 054F-0567-0564. In previous versions of Word I was able to hold down ALT and then type in the 4-digit decimal number. When I let go of ALT the character appeared. Using Character Map is practically useless for this exercise.</p>

<p>It was helpful to refer to <A HREF="http://www.alanwood.net/unicode/armenian.html">this page</A> which lists all of the letters and codes as well as <A HREF="http://www.learnarmenian.com/NonArmenian/NonArmenian.cfm">this page</A> which includes the sounds each letter makes.</p>

<p>Now I need the word for "uncle."</p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Nice Picture</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://mac.fiveforks.com/ted/blog/archive/2008/nice_picture.html
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://mac.fiveforks.com/cgi-bin/mt41/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=6/entry_id=2211" title="Nice Picture
    <id>tag:mac.fiveforks.com,2008:/ted/blog//6.2211</id>
    
    <published>2008-06-29T21:20:32Z</published>
    <updated>2008-06-30T04:33:00Z</updated>
    
    <summary>I was leaving the house today and there was a really neat butterfly on my purple cone flowers. In fact there were two of them. So I went back in the house and got the new camera, set it to...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Ted</name>
        
    </author>
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://mac.fiveforks.com/ted/blog/">
        <![CDATA[<p>I was leaving the house today and there was a really neat butterfly on my purple cone flowers. In fact there were two of them. So I went back in the house and got the <A HREF="http://mac.fiveforks.com/ted/blog/archive/2008/new_camera.html">new camera</A>, set it to macro, and tried it out. I don't think the butterflies liked the infrared autofocus, but they hung around long enough for me to get this one.</p>

<p><span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image" style="display: inline;"><a href="http://mac.fiveforks.com/ted/blog/archive/2008/butterfly.html" onclick="window.open('http://mac.fiveforks.com/ted/blog/archive/2008/butterfly.html','popup','width=1066,height=711,scrollbars=no,resizable=no,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=no,left=0,top=0'); return false"><img src="http://mac.fiveforks.com/ted/blog/archive/2008/butterfly-thumb-400x266.jpg" width="400" height="266" alt="butterfly.jpg" class="mt-image-center" style="text-align: center; display: block; margin: 0 auto 20px;" /></a></span></p>

<p>It seems to be an <A HREF="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Painted_Lady">American painted lady</A>,  <I>Vanessa virginiensis</I>,  in the family of brushfooted butterflies. It looks very different on top than on the underside of its wings which you see here.</p>

<p>I liked the picture so much that I cropped it and added it to my banner pictures at the top of the page. The pattern of the red-tipped flower spines is pretty dramatic up close along with the butterfly's pattern.</p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Signal Loops</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://mac.fiveforks.com/ted/blog/archive/2008/signal_loops.html
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://mac.fiveforks.com/cgi-bin/mt41/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=6/entry_id=2205" title="Signal Loops
    <id>tag:mac.fiveforks.com,2008:/ted/blog//6.2205</id>
    
    <published>2008-06-26T02:22:20Z</published>
    <updated>2008-06-26T02:34:28Z</updated>
    
    <summary>We&apos;ve been packing up stuff for our move at work this week. As part of that I&apos;ve been going through trade magazines and catching up before throwing them out. One kind of interesting article concerned research into traffic detection loops...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Ted</name>
        
    </author>
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://mac.fiveforks.com/ted/blog/">
        <![CDATA[<p>We've been packing up stuff for our move at work this week. As part of that I've been going through trade magazines and catching up before throwing them out. One kind of interesting article concerned research into traffic detection loops in roads. As someone who rode scooters for years, I can attest that traffic signals that use detection loops can be very frustrating because the motorcycle doesn't always have enough iron in it to trigger the loop that sits in grooves cut in the pavement (even worse for bicycles). Therefore you get stuck at a red light that won't change until someone else drives up behind you (or you run the red light under the "malfunctioning traffic light" justification). </p>

<p>This article talked about changing the sensitivity of the loops, but it also pointed out that the best chance you have of being detected is to be right on top of the wire, whereas I guess I believed you should be in the center of the loop itself. Being in the center is actually one of the worst spots because it puts you the maximum distance from both sides of the wire loop.</p>

<p>Some signals use some kind of radar on the signal head itself that is pointed at the lane and therefore "sees" traffic waiting. The advantage there is that when you repave (every 5-10 years) you don't have to reinstall loops that typically get torn up or buried in a paving opeartion. I think those would be better at detecting motorcycles and bicycles too.</p>

<p>. . . and into the recycling bin it goes!</p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Light Bulbs</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://mac.fiveforks.com/ted/blog/archive/2008/light_bulbs.html
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://mac.fiveforks.com/cgi-bin/mt41/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=6/entry_id=2186" title="Light Bulbs
    <id>tag:mac.fiveforks.com,2008:/ted/blog//6.2186</id>
    
    <published>2008-06-11T02:17:31Z</published>
    <updated>2008-06-10T02:22:45Z</updated>
    
    <summary>Tonight I went to Home Depot to get some 60 watt compact fluorescent bulbs and some 25 watt bulbs for my ceiling fan (which takes 3 lights and was down to 1 that worked). They had a special on the...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Ted</name>
        
    </author>
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://mac.fiveforks.com/ted/blog/">
        <![CDATA[<p>Tonight I went to Home Depot to get some 60 watt compact fluorescent bulbs and some 25 watt bulbs for my ceiling fan (which takes 3 lights and was down to 1 that worked). They had a special on the fluorescents: a 4-pack for $4.88. And they weren't even encased in a hermetically sealed consumer-proof plastic clamshell, nothing but cardboard. They're actually 14 watts and give off 60 watts of light (I wanted 75-watt equivalents but it was either 100 or 60). The stupid little fan lights use 25 watts and won't last nearly as long. And they cost almost as much: 4 bulbs for $3.68.</p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Your Mileage May Vary</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://mac.fiveforks.com/ted/blog/archive/2008/your_mileage_may_vary.html
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://mac.fiveforks.com/cgi-bin/mt41/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=6/entry_id=2183" title="Your Mileage May Vary
    <id>tag:mac.fiveforks.com,2008:/ted/blog//6.2183</id>
    
    <published>2008-06-09T23:00:35Z</published>
    <updated>2008-06-10T00:20:19Z</updated>
    
    <summary>Before filling the Mazda with gas, I figured I should have a range of about 360 miles on a tank of gas. That&apos;s 30 mpg times 12 gallons of gas. But as the fuel gauge sunk down, it looked like...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Ted</name>
        
    </author>
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://mac.fiveforks.com/ted/blog/">
        <![CDATA[<p>Before filling the <A HREF="http://mac.fiveforks.com/ted/blog/archive/2008/zoom_zoom.html">Mazda</A> with gas, I figured I should have a range of about 360 miles on a tank of gas. That's 30 mpg times 12 gallons of gas. But as the fuel gauge sunk down, it looked like I wasn't going to hit 360. In fact I hit about 300 miles before the low fuel light came on. It took about 12 gallons to fill it which meant that I had only gotten 25 miles per gallon. I thought maybe the first tank wouldn't get good mileage or maybe the dealer hadn't really topped off the tank. But realistically I should have gotten much better mileage since a lot of the miles were on the highway between the dealer and on a trip to Athens for Michael's birthday.</p>

<p>So I was antsy as I watched the progress of the second tank. When the tank was half empty I had gone less than 150 miles. Some fuel gauges are off. As I got to a quarter tank and with gas prices expected to spike soon, I went ahead and filled up. With 197 miles on the trip odometer, I was hoping for about 7 gallons of gas to fill the tank. But soon it reached 8 gallons (down to 25 mpg) and then didn't stop until 8.8. I entered the numbers into my calculator right away and was disgusted: 22 miles per gallon.</p>

<p>Obviously from my posts on <A HREF="http://mac.fiveforks.com/ted/blog/archive/2008/car_shopping_part_2.html">car shopping</A>, mileage was very important to me. Based on user comments on internet forums, I was expecting 28 mpg and hoping to get 30 (the number Consumer Reports gave as the overall expected mileage), well above the EPA city estimate of 24. 22 is simply not acceptable (20% less than the 28 I expected), but I'm pretty much stuck with the car.</p>

<p>I think I will take it in for service and see if the dealership can find something wrong with it. Maybe one of the tires isn't spinning or the brakes are stuck or they left the oil out.</p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Text Message Spam</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://mac.fiveforks.com/ted/blog/archive/2008/text_message_spam.html
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://mac.fiveforks.com/cgi-bin/mt41/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=6/entry_id=2182" title="Text Message Spam
    <id>tag:mac.fiveforks.com,2008:/ted/blog//6.2182</id>
    
    <published>2008-06-08T21:17:47Z</published>
    <updated>2008-06-15T17:15:21Z</updated>
    
    <summary>This weekend I got a series of text messages from 678-315-xxxx. It started with &quot;Hey what&apos;s up?&quot; Then I got two copies of the picture below (do you know this girl?). Then I got a longer message &quot;Hey wesley its...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Ted</name>
        
    </author>
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://mac.fiveforks.com/ted/blog/">
        <![CDATA[<p>This weekend I got a series of text messages from 678-315-xxxx. It started with "Hey what's up?" Then I got two copies of the picture below (do you know this girl?). Then I got a longer message "Hey wesley its kirstin on ericas phone...im at the lake hizouse with her, and I don't get service down here...sorry..iloveyou"</p>

<p><span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image"><a href="http://mac.fiveforks.com/ted/blog/archive/2008/spam.html" onclick="window.open('http://mac.fiveforks.com/ted/blog/archive/2008/spam.html','popup','width=600,height=480,scrollbars=no,resizable=no,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=no,left=0,top=0'); return false"><img src="http://mac.fiveforks.com/ted/blog/archive/2008/spam-thumb-400x320.jpg" width="400" height="320" alt="spam.jpg" class="mt-image-center" style="text-align: center; display: block; margin: 0 auto 20px;" /></a></span></p>

<p>I have no idea who this person or this number is, so I can only assume it is some kind of spam. There may be a chance that it is not since it is a local number. I don't know what Verizon charges for a text message (used  to be 10 cents, now may be 25), but this spam has cost me (actually Jeb) from 40 cents to a dollar already.</p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>New Camera</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://mac.fiveforks.com/ted/blog/archive/2008/new_camera.html
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://mac.fiveforks.com/cgi-bin/mt41/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=6/entry_id=2171" title="New Camera
    <id>tag:mac.fiveforks.com,2008:/ted/blog//6.2171</id>
    
    <published>2008-06-03T03:12:19Z</published>
    <updated>2008-06-03T03:52:33Z</updated>
    
    <summary>I wanted to get a digital camera before my trip to Ireland this Summer. Susan has a compact camera, so I was wanting something with a powerful zoom. I narrowed my choices down to two cameras: the Canon SX100IS and...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Ted</name>
        
    </author>
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://mac.fiveforks.com/ted/blog/">
        <![CDATA[<p>I wanted to get a digital camera before my trip to Ireland this Summer. Susan has a compact camera, so I was wanting something with a powerful zoom. I narrowed my choices down to two cameras: the <A HREF="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/B000V1VG4W/tedsbatterpac-20">Canon SX100IS</A> and the <A HREF="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/B0011Z6D86/tedsbatterpac-20">Panasonic Lumix DMC-TZ4K</A>, both around $230. Neither has a viewfinder and instead rely on the LCD screen on the back. Both use SD cards. Both are 8 megapixel cameras with optical image stabilization and 10x zoom lenses. The Panasonic's lens varies from 28mm to 280mm while the Canon was 36 mm to 360 mm. That means the Panasonic can take wide angle shots, but the Canon can zoom things in closer. I liked the wide angle feature because sometimes you can't back up far enough to fit something in the frame. From reviews I found, both cameras were ranked pretty highly and people on Amazon liked them.<br />
</p>]]>
        <![CDATA[<p><CENTER><img alt="panasonictz4k.jpg" src="http://mac.fiveforks.com/ted/blog/archive/2008/panasonictz4k.jpg" width="280" height="280" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-TZ4K"/></CENTER></p>

<p>Jeb said no question I should get a Canon. Consumer Reports seemed to rank the Canon a little higher, but Panasonic's repair history was better. The Panasonic is a little more compact and weighs a couple of ounces less than the Canon (9 oz. vs. 11). The Panasonic looks better too and I was leaning that way. Finally today I got the latest Consumer Reports which ranked the Canon higher than the previous (but very similar) version of the Panasonic. They also liked a Sony, but the Sony uses Sony memory sticks instead of SD cards, which was a deal breaker for me. The deciding factor was probably image quality and the Canon had the edge, getting a half full circle from Consumer Reports while the Panasonic got a neutral circle (one increment lower). Also, one thing I thought would be good about the Canon was it uses 2 AA batteries while the Panasonic uses a unique internal battery. But people were saying the battery life of the Canon was very short and the Panasonic was amazing. Consumer Reports, however, said they could take hundreds of pictures with 2 AA batteries, so that seems to be a wash (though I bet CR used some kind of super AA batteries that I am too cheap to buy).</p>

<p><br />
So tonight I went ahead and ordered the Canon. It comes in silver or black and I got black.</p>

<p><br />
<CENTER><img alt="canonsx100is.jpg" src="http://mac.fiveforks.com/ted/blog/archive/2008/canonsx100is.jpg" width="280" height="280" alt="Canon SX100IS" /></CENTER></p>]]>
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Back to Speedfactory</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://mac.fiveforks.com/ted/blog/archive/2008/back_to_speedfactory.html
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://mac.fiveforks.com/cgi-bin/mt41/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=6/entry_id=2163" title="Back to Speedfactory
    <id>tag:mac.fiveforks.com,2008:/ted/blog//6.2163</id>
    
    <published>2008-05-28T01:47:36Z</published>
    <updated>2008-05-28T02:08:26Z</updated>
    
    <summary>Last week I was doing an overdue update to my iPod battery pack page. Traffic has trickled off lately to 150 visits per day whereas before I moved everything to iGirder I was getting about 300. Part of the reason...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Ted</name>
        
    </author>
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://mac.fiveforks.com/ted/blog/">
        <![CDATA[<p>Last week I was doing an overdue update to my iPod battery pack page. Traffic has trickled off lately to 150 visits per day whereas before I moved everything to <A HREF="http://mac.fiveforks.com/ted/blog/archive/2008/igirder.html">iGirder</A> I was getting about 300. Part of the reason may have been that I hadn't updated the pages in a while, but the page just doesn't rank very high (I did get a payoff almost immediately when someone bought one of the new iPhone battery packs I wrote about for $50 yielding $3 in commissions). Overall revenue from AdSense and Amazon is down to about a third of what it used to be. </p>]]>
        <![CDATA[<p>Although I have had <A HREF="http://mac.fiveforks.com/ted/blog/archive/2008/redirects.html">redirects</A> in place since January, the page still had no <A HREF="http://mac.fiveforks.com/ted/blog/archive/2008/ad_buy.html">page rank</A> with Google and when searching for "iPod battery pack" I was coming up on the second (which I described in my post about my advertising client) page of results. On a whim, I thought I would put a copy of the page back in its original location on Speedfactory. Within a couple of days it was top-ranked at Google and had a page rank of 3 (it had been 4). Because Amazon sales and AdSense revenue are kind of spotty, it's hard to say if this means more revenue, but I was getting more hits on the relocated page than anything else. I'm thinking about moving the DeJumbler over as well to see what would happen. If I see significant increases in revenue, it would probably be worthwhile to continue my Speedfactory dial-up account for $99 per year just to keep the free webspace that I use for that web page.</p>

<p>I will keep iGirder, but maybe only as my personal homepage while Speedfactory becomes the more technical site.</p>]]>
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Zoom Zoom</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://mac.fiveforks.com/ted/blog/archive/2008/zoom_zoom.html
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://mac.fiveforks.com/cgi-bin/mt41/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=6/entry_id=2159" title="Zoom Zoom
    <id>tag:mac.fiveforks.com,2008:/ted/blog//6.2159</id>
    
    <published>2008-05-23T01:29:08Z</published>
    <updated>2008-05-25T17:28:42Z</updated>
    
    <summary>I&apos;m back from the dealer and am the proud owner of a Mazda 3! Everything went pretty smoothly. I got there at 7:00 and was out by 8:30. They didn&apos;t push warranties real hard or even explain a whole lot....</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Ted</name>
        
    </author>
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://mac.fiveforks.com/ted/blog/">
        <![CDATA[<p>I'm back from the dealer and am the proud owner of a Mazda 3! Everything went pretty smoothly. I got there at 7:00 and was out by 8:30. They didn't push warranties real hard or even explain a whole lot. The only glitches were the price was wrong, but we tracked that down to the car they were originally going to get that had the spoiler on it. Another glitch in the price was that $500 of the discount was a rebate, so they had to charge me a price $500 higher than I thought. While they would take the $500 off at the end (the dealer will actually receive the rebate), it meant I had to pay 7% sales tax on the $500. So that cost me $35. The last glitch was I wrote the check for the full amount I had to pay, forgetting about the $1000 I had already put down. The finance guy said I wrote the check for $1000 too much and I thought he was kidding. Eventually he said "No, really, this check is for the wrong amount." They said they could put a credit on my credit card, but I said I could just write a new check.</p>

<p><a href="http://mac.fiveforks.com/ted/blog/archive/2008/mazda3.html" onclick="window.open('http://mac.fiveforks.com/ted/blog/archive/2008/mazda3.html','popup','width=800,height=567,scrollbars=no,resizable=no,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=no,left=0,top=0'); return false"><img src="http://mac.fiveforks.com/ted/blog/archive/2008/mazda3-thumb.jpg" width="400" height="283" alt="" /></a></p>]]>
        <![CDATA[<p>When I first got there my car was parked right in front and looked great. The salesman met me and I got in the car and we drove to the nearest gas station to have my tank filled on their card. The car performs a little better than my Civic and has more conveniences and extras, some of which have developed over time (like the fading courtesy light when you take the key out) and some are extras that Honda still doesn't include in their high-end Civic. It's pretty on the outside and in. After looking for them all over on the roads during the last week and seeing hardly any, I looked over while I was on I-285 and there was a gray one like mine a couple of lanes over.</p>

<p><a href="http://mac.fiveforks.com/ted/blog/archive/2008/mazda3s.html" onclick="window.open('http://mac.fiveforks.com/ted/blog/archive/2008/mazda3s.html','popup','width=800,height=567,scrollbars=no,resizable=no,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=no,left=0,top=0'); return false"><img src="http://mac.fiveforks.com/ted/blog/archive/2008/mazda3s-thumb.jpg" width="400" height="283" alt="" /></a></p>

<p>One interesting thing I found out was that Mazda of Roswell will automatically give you invoice price if you are a USAA member. It is part of the S Plan, which is normally for families of Mazda employees. I got mine for a little below invoice, so it wouldn't have helped me to know that earlier.</p>]]>
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Car Clay</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://mac.fiveforks.com/ted/blog/archive/2008/car_clay.html
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://mac.fiveforks.com/cgi-bin/mt41/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=6/entry_id=2156" title="Car Clay
    <id>tag:mac.fiveforks.com,2008:/ted/blog//6.2156</id>
    
    <published>2008-05-22T00:52:50Z</published>
    <updated>2008-05-22T01:52:24Z</updated>
    
    <summary>When I bought my car in 1998 the salesman said that I should make sure I put a good coat of wax on it. I waited a while and then I got sap on it and the paint job was...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Ted</name>
        
    </author>
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://mac.fiveforks.com/ted/blog/">
        <![CDATA[<p>When I bought my car in 1998 the salesman said that I should make sure I put a good coat of wax on it. I waited a while and then I got sap on it and the paint job was never the same. Even when I did wax it, there were bumps and rough spots. With a new car on the way (probably tomorrow) I wanted to see what I needed to do to keep the finish in good shape even though the car will be in the sun all the time.</p>

<p>The internet is full of people who are insane about taking care of their cars. There are all kinds of different products out there, but one new thing to me was the idea of claying a car. It consists of applying some kind of liquid to the car and then rubbing clay on it. The clay isn't abrasive, but picks up specs of dirt that give a rough finish. It only picks up things that stick above the surface, so it isn't intended to fix scratches. It seemed pretty extreme, but as I read about it, it started to intrigue me. There are <A HREF="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yfEfLGL59GI">How-To clay videos</A> about how to do it on You Tube. Meguiar's, a reputable "over the counter" car wax maker (as opposed to online only), sells a <A HREF="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/B00063X7KG/tedsbatterpac-20">Smooth Surface Clay Kit</A> that includes two blocks of clay (like modeling clay), the liquid, a buffing towel (it's all microfiber these days, no chamois), and some cleaner wax. I wound up visiting AutoZone last night and picked up a kit for $18.</p>]]>
        <![CDATA[<p>Even though it was dark at that point, I washed a small spot on the hood of the Civic, and then started with the clay. The Civic's surface is almost like sandpaper that has lost most of its grit. You don't have to rub very hard, just let the clay move over the surface. Within seconds I had smoothed out a spot. I was able to smooth out the whole test spot in a minute. It was very smooth (except for some scratches from road debris that has hit the front of the car). I applied the wax and buffed it off. Unfortunately the scratches caught all of the wax and showed up white against the black surface. It might be better to either try to repair the scratches or use something that goes on clear. Maybe NuFinish, though I need to look into that some more.</p>

<p>Anyway, the clay doesn't really do anything except give you a smooth surface for you to apply wax. It offers no protection in itself. So you still have to find a wax (not a polish which technically is abrasive and removes material). The one that fanatical people on the internet use is called Zaino. It is a process consisting of six different bottles of stuff and an <A HREF="http://www.zainostore.com/Merchant2/merchant.mvc?Screen=PROD&Product_Code=ZKIT-1">entire kit</A> costs $84. But it leaves an amazing shine that is more durable than a conventional wax (a regular carnuba wax only lasts a couple of months tops; the synthetics last 3-6 months). The Zaino process takes all day and is kind of expensive and is only available online or through distributors. People posting messages at autopia.com like to make fun of Turtle Wax and other readily available and inexpensive products and then say "there are other products that are better and not that expensive." But they don't tell you the name of those products. Then they might point out that other discussion threads go into the details. Eventually I found out about Duragloss products.</p>

<p>The first thing I found out about is a synthetic coating that gives the car a wet and shiny look. That product is <A HREF="http://www.duragloss.com/product.asp?pid=272">Duragloss AquaWax</A>. It's about $8. They also make a more conventional wax that you should apply first called <A HREF="http://www.duragloss.com/product.asp?pid=336">Total Performance Polish 105</A>, $10, (not actually a polish). But for best results they recommend another product called <A HREF="http://www.duragloss.com/product.asp?pid=275">Polish Bonding Agent 601</A>, $7.50. This is some kind of wax which chemically bonds the 105 to the finish of the car and then hardens like an epoxy. I guess eventually it wears off without affecting the paint. Some people swear by that system, though it doesn't give the shine of Zaino. They say it is more durable than anything Meguiar's makes (apparently Meguiar's is geared towards people who wax their cars monthly). Duragloss is not available at AutoZone or most other chains, but it is available at <A HREF="http://www.carquest.com/">CarQuest</A>. There are a few stores in Atlanta, so that's what I plan to use.</p>]]>
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Car Shopping Part 2</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://mac.fiveforks.com/ted/blog/archive/2008/car_shopping_part_2.html
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://mac.fiveforks.com/cgi-bin/mt41/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=6/entry_id=2154" title="Car Shopping Part 2
    <id>tag:mac.fiveforks.com,2008:/ted/blog//6.2154</id>
    
    <published>2008-05-15T20:07:57Z</published>
    <updated>2008-05-17T02:35:09Z</updated>
    
    <summary>After looking closely at the Toyota Prius and Honda Civics in Part 1 I started looking very closely at the Mazda 3. The 3 comes in too many varieties to keep track of, but got good reviews in Consumer Reports...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Ted</name>
        
    </author>
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://mac.fiveforks.com/ted/blog/">
        <![CDATA[<p>After looking closely at the Toyota Prius and Honda Civics in <A HREF="http://mac.fiveforks.com/ted/blog/archive/2008/car_shopping_part_1.html">Part 1</A> I started looking very closely at the Mazda 3. The 3 comes in too many varieties to keep track of, but got good reviews in Consumer Reports with very good expected reliability. The mileage was just a mile per gallon or two less than the Civic, but it has more horsepower and therefore better acceleration. By choosing a manual transmission, the mileage should still be very good, around 27 mpg to the Civic's 28. While the Civics were running around invoice price, the 3 is selling below invoice due to some dealer incentives. The guy at the dealer said via e-mail that his offer was for me to build any type of Mazda3 I wanted and he would take $2,000 off the MSRP, putting it below invoice. For about the same price as the Civic LX without a sunroof, I could get the 3 with a sunroof and a stereo that holds 6 CD's (including MP3-encoded CD's). Like with Honda, I could get 1.9% financing for up to 36 months. So I can finance $11,000 and pay about $320 a month. Then I only have to come up with $7,000 in cash.</p>]]>
        <![CDATA[<p><a href="http://mac.fiveforks.com/ted/blog/archive/2008/mazda3bk.jpg"><img alt="mazda3bk.jpg" src="http://mac.fiveforks.com/ted/blog/archive/2008/mazda3bk-thumb.jpg" width="375" height="159" /></a></p>

<p>Not wanting to waste any time and having already taken the morning off to take the dogs to the vet, I went to visit Roswell Mazda today. They did not have any manual transmission cars because they said with Atlanta traffic most people seem to want automatics (I think cell phone usage in cars is playing a part too). There was nothing particularly great about the car. It was very similar to my Civic but with some nice touches. For instance, it has an aux input for the car stereo so you can hook up your iPod. Rather than have a jack on the front with wires hanging out, the jack is in the console along with a power port. So the iPod can sit in the console with no wires showing. If you want to have the iPod out in the car, there is a wire passthrough into the console. Also the console has a top compartment where you can put an iPod if you don't want to put it in with whatever other junk is in the console. The glove compartment will hold a laptop computer. It has air bags all over the place: front, side, and side curtain. It comes with some nice doo dads like alloy wheels, fog lights, cruise control, floor mats, power windows, sunroof, mirrors, etc. It's pretty much loaded.</p>

<p>The only problem was getting the car I wanted. The 3 comes in a 5-door hatchback and a souped up hatchback called the Speed3 shaped like small station wagons and not what I wanted. The sedan comes in an i and s version as well as touring and sport. The s version has a bigger engine, goes faster, gets worse mileage, and costs $2,000 more. The sport model seems to be stripped of most options. To further complicate matters, they came out with a newer version in the middle of their 2008 year, called a "value" edition because they put all the options on and charge more money. This model is called the <B>Mazda3 i Touring Value 4-Door</B>. Of course there are automatic transmissions and manual ones. The only option I wanted was the combined moonroof and 6-cd stereo upgrade which is $890. I didn't think I was picky on colors, willing to go with silver or gray. Originally I also wanted a bright blue, but that one comes with a tan interior that I think would show too much Katie and Austin fur. Silver and gray both come with dark interiors. The gray is called Metropolitan Gray and is a charcoal gray with blue in it. The dealer said it was very similar to a gunmetal gray they offered a few years ago. The only car like that in the southeast was at a dealer in Raleigh. They said that was too far for them to go without charging me additional transportation. I said I would fly to Raleigh and pick it up (on the way home Clark Howard was talking about a $39 deal AirTran is having to Raleigh), but they said then I would have to get the sale from the dealer in Raleigh and it would probably cost me more (they just do a one-for-one trade when they get a car from another dealer, so very little money changes hands). They looked some more and found another gray car in Nashville but it had a spoiler on the back which added $325 to the price. It's a pretty dinky spoiler (not the bigger wing spoiler they also offer, it is called a lip spoiler and is just a piece of molding that fits on the top of the trunk). I asked if they could just order the car I wanted and they said that since the cars are made in Japan that it would take 3-4 months. So I'm buying the spoiler.</p>

<p>They're supposed to get it as early as this weekend, but probably Monday. They were also interested in my car, saying 1998 Civics are very easy for them to sell right now with students looking for cars. The good thing about a trade-in, if their offer is what I want, is that they apply the cost of the trade-in to the price I am paying, which reduces sales tax on the new car (I think). Jeb has also expressed interest, so we'll see.</p>

<p>For completeness, here's a table of the cars I was looking at with the Mazda3, including EPA city mileage and gas costs for 100,000 miles at $3.80 per gallon:</p>

<p><TABLE><TR><TH>Car</TH><TH>Price</TH><TH>Mileage</TH><TH>100k Gas</TH></TR><TR><TD>Toyota Prius</TD><TD>$26,126</TD><TD>48 mpg</TD><TD>$7,917</TD></TR><TR><TD>Civic Hybrid</TD><TD>$24,473</TD><TD>40 mpg</TD><TD>$9,500</TD></TR><TR><TD>Civic EX</TD><TD>$19,532</TD><TD>26 mpg</TD><TD>$14,615</TD></TR><TR><TD>Civic LX</TD><TD>$17,816</TD><TD>26 mpg</TD><TD>$14,615</TD></TR><TR><TD>Mazda3</TD><TD>$18,105</TD><TD>24 mpg</TD><TD>$15,833</TD></TR></TABLE></p>

<p>Honestly, I think the car will get better mileage than 24 mpg, even mostly in the city. If I use EPA's higher numbers for the hybrids and Consumer Reports' higher numbers for the non-hybrids, the chart looks like this:</p>

<p><TABLE><TR><TH>Car</TH><TH>Price</TH><TH>Mileage</TH><TH>100k Gas</TH></TR><TR><TD>Toyota Prius</TD><TD>$26,126</TD><TD>48 mpg</TD><TD>$7,917</TD></TR><TR><TD>Civic Hybrid</TD><TD>$24,473</TD><TD>40 mpg</TD><TD>$9,500</TD></TR><TR><TD>Civic EX</TD><TD>$19,532</TD><TD>31 mpg</TD><TD>$12,258</TD></TR><TR><TD>Civic LX</TD><TD>$17,816</TD><TD>31 mpg</TD><TD>$12,258</TD></TR><TR><TD>Mazda3</TD><TD>$18,105</TD><TD>30 mpg</TD><TD>$12,667</TD></TR></TABLE></p>]]>
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Bluejay Babies</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://mac.fiveforks.com/ted/blog/archive/2008/bluejay_babies.html
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://mac.fiveforks.com/cgi-bin/mt41/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=6/entry_id=2153" title="Bluejay Babies
    <id>tag:mac.fiveforks.com,2008:/ted/blog//6.2153</id>
    
    <published>2008-05-14T23:03:25Z</published>
    <updated>2008-05-29T23:48:11Z</updated>
    
    <summary>In the last couple of weeks, any time I would let the dogs out in the backyard, a robin would start yelling at me. Also I saw a broken eggshell where a baby robin had hatched. So I was on...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Ted</name>
        
    </author>
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://mac.fiveforks.com/ted/blog/">
        <![CDATA[<p>In the last couple of weeks, any time I would let the dogs out in the backyard, a robin would start yelling at me. Also I saw a broken eggshell where a baby robin had hatched. So I was on the lookout for a nest. This morning I found one in the branches of my maple tree in the back. But the bird sitting on the nest was gray, not a robin. This afternoon I noticed the mother bird was gone so I got the camera and ladder and went up to check out what was there. The babies (3 or 4) opened their mouths when I came up. But before I could snap their pictures, their parents came around yelling at me. Bluejays! The father actually smacked into my head a couple of times. With them yelling the babies crouched down in the nest. I still got a picture:</p>

<p><a href="http://mac.fiveforks.com/ted/blog/archive/2008/bluejaybaby.jpg"><img alt="bluejaybaby.jpg" src="http://mac.fiveforks.com/ted/blog/archive/2008/bluejaybaby-thumb.jpg" width="360" height="360" /></a></p>

<p>Here's another one taken May 23, getting feathers:<br />
<a href="http://mac.fiveforks.com/ted/blog/archive/2008/bluejay2.jpg"><img alt="bluejay2.jpg" src="http://mac.fiveforks.com/ted/blog/archive/2008/bluejay2-thumb.jpg" width="360" height="360" /></a></p>

<p>By May 29, the nest was empty but the parents were still hanging around and protective. I found a fledgling under the tree hidden in the ivy:<br />
<a href="http://mac.fiveforks.com/ted/blog/archive/2008/fledge.html" onclick="window.open('http://mac.fiveforks.com/ted/blog/archive/2008/fledge.html','popup','width=688,height=688,scrollbars=no,resizable=no,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=no,left=0,top=0'); return false"><img src="http://mac.fiveforks.com/ted/blog/archive/2008/fledge-thumb.jpg" width="400" height="400" alt="" /></a></p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

</feed> 

